Review: DinoPC Titanosaurus Rex

Review: DinoPC Titanosaurus Rex

The huge roar the Titanosaurus Rex makes when it boots up was probably not a deliberate play on the name of this latest DinoPC, but it will make you think some beast has inhabited your new machine and will probably scare off any mammal in earshot. Yes, we’ve got another big, pricey rig here with Nvidia’s ultra-desirable GTX Titan taking care of the pixel-pushing duties.

Last month we saw the excellent Scan 3XS Z77 Vengeance Titan become the benchmark PC for every other Titan-based machine that was to follow it. The Computer Planet machine it was up against simply couldn’t compete with the smart choice of components, the aggressive pricing or the top warranty Scan offers.

So, how can this DinoPC compete against something like that? Well, the simple fact is, it can’t. The Titanosaurus Rex does tick all the necessary component boxes, and has a fantastically ridiculous name, too: it’s got a hefty overclock on its i7 3770K, a decent mobo, quick memory, a mid-sized SSD, lots of data storage space, water-cooling and a very sexy chassis.

The component choice isn’t flawless though: DinoPC has opted to go for RAM rated at 2,400MHz, but has halved the amount that either the other Titan machines from last month offered or, indeed, the Wired2Fire Titanosaurus Rex.

It’s also opted to add in some relatively pointless extras, including a Blu-ray drive and a pricey motherboard, too.

A hefty price tag

All those definitely add in to the luxury, high-end rig aesthetic, but are practically irrelevant for a machine whose main reason for being is to throw polygons around at high-resolutions and high speeds.

Where the Scan machine did so well was to choose a price-point and stick to it. The Titanosaurus Rex is another £300 (about AU$ 460, US$ 455) more expensive than the 3XS rig, and none of that cash has gone in to making this machine perform better where it counts. And since Scan took the choice to make a slight overclock to the Titan card, this DinoPC actually performs worse in-game.

Benchmarks

CPU rendering performance
Cinebench R11.5: Index score: Higher is better

TITANOSAURUS REX: 9.37
3XS Z77 VENGEANCE TITAN: 9.43
DIABLO PHANTOM: 9.22

DirectX 11 gaming performance
DIRT Showdown: FPS: Higher is better

TITANOSAURUS REX: 64
3XS Z77 VENGEANCE TITAN: 74
DIABLO PHANTOM: 46

DirectX 11 gaming performance
Max Payne 3: FPS: Higher is better

TITANOSAURUS REX: 43
3XS Z77 VENGEANCE TITAN: 47
DIABLO PHANTOM: 30

That beefy price tag also means its £700 (about AU$ 1,080, US$ 1,065) dearer than the Wired2Fire Diablo Phantom. And while it is faster, there’s nothing about it beyond the build quality that makes it worth that price premium. The GTX 680 in the Diablo Phantom is a great GPU, and at £1,600 (about AU$ 2,460, $ US2,430), it’s a quality PC at a decent price.

Verdict

There are a few concerns over the setup of the DinoPC Titanosaurus Rex. Remember that roar we mentioned? When you buy a rig of this price – especially one that promises a premium experience – you don’t want it to sound like a Harrier jumpjet.

DinoPC has plumbed in the Corsair CPU cooler but minus the controlling software, so the twin fans sit at 100 per cent all the time. It’s simply not an experience that suits the high price tag.

TechRadar: All latest anti malware software reviews feeds

Review: Wired2Fire Diablo Phantom

Review: Wired2Fire Diablo Phantom

Up to the £1,000 (AU$ 1,530, US$ 1,500) mark, there’s are a huge variety of different specs you can throw into a PC and still come out with a decent gaming rig. Just look at the Daw Computers machine and the Vibox Power FX.

Above that price point though, things stagnate very quickly. From here until the crazy-priced machines with their hex-core Sandy Bridge Extreme and octo-core Xeons, it’s all about the Core i7 3770K and whatever overclock the SI can squeeze out of it – and, of course, the Z77 motherboard.

This Wired2Fire machine comes slap-bang in between the lower-end machines, like the Daw and Vibox rigs, and the top-tier Titan machines that are starting to pop up everywhere. But when you compare it with those £2,000+ (about AU$ 3,000+, US$ 3,000+) rigs, the only real difference you’ll see is in the choice of graphics card that’s been used.

At the £1,600 (about AU$ 2,460, US$ 2,430) Wired2Fire is targeting with the Diablo Phantom, you’re moving away from the cheaper machines that will usually sacrifice some general niceties for top CPU and GPU combos and are getting a full gaming PC with all the benefits you’d expect from a premium rig.

That means that as well as the ubiquitously overclocked 3770K, you’ve got a quality Asus P8Z77-V motherboard, a huge amount of quick Corsair Vengeance system memory and lots of data storage, as well as two Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB SSDs.

The Diablo Phantom has taken the odd step of using a RAID array to give the SandForce-powered Kingston HyperX 3K drives a bit of a speed boost. But the extra boost from RAID is negligible when you start to include the problems of incompressible data handling you get with SandForce.

Rough edges

The NZXT Phantom chassis that Wired2Fire has used in this build is visually striking but somewhat disappointing. It looks pretty funky from a distance, but when you get up close you can see the plastic of the orange detailing hasn’t been finished that well. However, it does run much quieter than the DinoPC Titanosaurus Rex.

Benchmarks

CPU encoding performance
X264 v4.0: Frames per second: Higher is better

DIABLO PHANTOM: 51.44
TITANSAURUS REX: 51.61

DirectX 11 tessellation performance
Heaven 4.0: Frames per second: Higher is better

DIABLO PHANTOM: 23.7
TITANSAURUS REX: 35.2

DirectX 11 1080p gaming performance
Crysis 3: Frames per second: Higher is better

DIABLO PHANTOM: 50
TITANSAURUS REX: 66

Unfortunately, the active cooling doesn’t seem to be sufficient for the chip to run stably at the 4.7GHz it came clocked at out of the box. We managed an initial successful run of Cinebench, but further runs fell over and even once we’d taken it down a notch to 4.6GHz (which is what all our benchmarks were run at afterwards), the X264 test struggled to complete.

Verdict

Once it’s running, this is a decent rig, and although it’s not quite in the same league as the Titans, it’s not far off – especially when you consider it’s substantially cheaper than the DinoPC and can still happily knock around 2,560 x 1,600 gaming.

TechRadar: All latest anti malware software reviews feeds

Hands-on review: Google IO: Google Glass

Hands-on review: Google IO: Google Glass

Only at Google IO in techy-savvy San Francisco could a Google Glass wearer walk the streets relatively unnoticed. A limited number of these new wearable computing devices have been among the public for months now, and they generally elicit double takes and curious stares.

There were plenty of those lucky Glass owners among the IO crowd, as well as Google reps standing by to demonstrate the technology. At the conference, we had the opportunity to try on Glass, and unbox one of the kits passed out to select developers.

The fitting

Just like a normal pair of glasses, Google Glass needs just a bit of adjustment to be worn properly. It mainly comes down to the nose pads, which make sure that Glass’ titanium band runs slightly above the eye line, like a sunshade or visor.

That way, the rectangular screen, which looks something like a prism, sits just above the eye. Using the screen requires you to look up slightly, which helps to keep your field of vision unobstructed.

Google Glass review

The striking thing about this new tech is that even though you’re wearing it, it does a good job of getting out of the way when not in use. Glass’ display quickly goes dim, like an idle smartphone. Still, even when it is in use, it’s easy to see the world around you.

Wearing Glass for the first time, we were struck by how light and unobtrusive it was. Lighter than a pair of normal spectacles, we imagine it would be easy to forget you were wearing them, if not for all the stares.

Turning on Glass

Glass is initially activated with a power button found on the inside portion. When you wear it, this switch is not easily accessible, so turning it fully on or off is done only when they are removed.

Google Glass review

Glass goes to sleep when not in use, and you can wake it by simply nodding up. This isn’t just to save power, but to keep your field of vision clear when you don’t need any info. Google reps said that Glass’ battery would last all day with "average use." Just like a smartphone, it has micro-USB for charging, and lots of video recording will wear it down before the day is out.

‘Ok, Glass’

The Google Glass interface is a lot like Google Now, which is found on any Android Jelly Bean smartphone. From the main screen, saying "Ok, Glass," gets the device’s attention, so to speak, and prompts Glass to show you available commands.

Google Glass review

There are also Google Now cards – screens of information related to recent searches. They’re pretty minimalist, white text on a black background, sometimes with a single image. We swiped through nearby restaurants, email chains and recently captured pictures and videos. This is done using a touchpad built into the right side of the headset. You can also tap to make selections.

An extension of your smartphone

While Glass has its own hard drive (ours had 12GB available), Wi-Fi connection, GPS, and processor (no specifics on the core), all working from Android 4.2 Jelly Bean, it works best as an extension of your smartphone.

It can pair with an Android phone using Bluetooth, which allows it to make calls as well as send and receive text messages. In that way it felt more like the ultimate hands-free device than a wearable computer.

Google Glass review

It also suffers a similar stigma to the Bluetooth earpiece, in that it’s distracting, and a bit goofy looking. Basically, you’re like something out of Star Trek. Whether that’s Geordi La Forge or a Borg drone is in the eye of the beholder. The irony is that it’s technology designed for subtly that ends up speaking volumes.

It talks back

Speaking of speaking, Google Glass can actually talk to you. There’s a little speaker that sits over your right ear. Google reps described it as a bone-vibrating speaker, like something Snake would use behind enemy lines in Metal Gear Solid. Really though, it struck us just your average speaker, and was completely audible to someone standing within earshot, providing the room wasn’t too loud.

We asked Glass who the president of the United States was, and it responded with a snippet of Barack Obama’s biography. We had trouble hearing it over the din of the show floor, but moving to a back room, it was perfectly audible, and spoke in the sort of lady robot voice of Google Now.

Not Mission: Impossible material

The Google rep guiding our demo joked that Glass would make terrible surveillance technology, and that’s by design. Google is actively trying to reduce the voyeur factor by making it rather obvious when Glass is engaged. The screen emits a glow when in use, and spoken commands like "take a picture" make sure those around you are clued in to what you’re doing.

You also have to look up to read the screen, so broken eye contact will be a dead giveaway. Your friends will know when you’re checking football scores instead of listening to them.

Google Glass review

It was also far less like augmented reality than we’d imagined. Putting it on, we thought we see an HUD of some sort, like in a first-person shooter video game. Really though, we felt more like a multitasking administrator than Robocop on patrol for creeps. Even the GPS function just gives you a top down view, with a blue arrow representing your location, just like Google Maps on your phone.

Relatively app-less

The version of Google Glass on demo at IO was a prototype, an early developer or "explorer" version, as Google likes to call them. Given that, there wasn’t a whole lot of functionality available to it.

Google Glass review

Facebook, Twitter, The New York Times and a few more have apps on the way, but until then, Glass feels more like raw potential than an actual tool.

The interface is also pretty unintuitive, especially the touchpad part. Since only one "card" is visible at a time, you’re stuck swiping through them all until you find what you want. We found it easier to just ask Glass to find something again, rather than swipe around for previously accessed information.

Early verdict

Is Glass cool and entirely novel? Yes, it certainly is. Is it a device that will change the life of, or even just prove useful to, the average consumer? That’s doubtful.

Glass as we tried it felt like something that would be useful to folks in specialized roles. A surgeon, an engineer, a warehouse foremen or a certain type of viral video filmmaker will likely find a lot of compelling things to do with Glass.

As for the average person, it’s a bit of a paradox. We can think of a dozen times where we’ve been cooking, cleaning or driving and would’ve loved to have had hands-free, subtle access to Google’s wealth of information. But to do so, we’ve got to wear a piece of headgear that’s distracting to those around us.

We also wondered how Google plans to curate the apps that become avaialable for Glass. We’ve heard about plans for apps that will allow wearers to snap pictures with a wink, which seems to go against Google’s plan to keep Glass behavior obvious to those around you.

Google Glass is expected to arrive for public consumption in 2014. When it does arrive, it may change lives, but most likely not your life, or the lives of those around you.

TechRadar: All latest anti malware software reviews feeds

Review: Asus GTX 670 Direct CU Mini

Review: Asus GTX 670 Direct CU Mini

With the new Xbox being touted as simply a small form factor Win8 device, and the rise and rise of ever-smaller components in computing generally, it really was only a matter of time before we started to see the graphics card manufacturers getting in on the miniaturisation game.

This is also the first high-end graphics card we’ve come across that’s been designed from the ground up for the small form factor, mini-ITX crowd and it’s an impressive thing to behold.

When we first saw the GTX 670 in reference trim from Nvidia itself, the size of the PCB, compared to the size of the cooling, instantly jumped out at us. The 173mm circuit board only took up just under three quarters of the length of the card as a whole, with the extra length catering for the reference cooling solution needed to keep the GK104 GPU honest.

The real surprise though, is the fact it’s taken this long to get to a stage where we’re seeing card manufacturers coming out with their own cooling arrays based on the size of the PCB, rather than just the size of standard cards.

Quality cooling

The issue has possibly been one of ensuring you get enough heat dissipation in a smaller cooling setup, to ensure the GPU can carry on operating at the sorts of speeds something like a GTX 670 needs to.

Impressively, Asus’s GTX 670 Mini more than manages this feat. This is no reference-clocked card: this is a proper overclocked SKU. The chunky DirectCU cooling makes the GTX 670 Mini a hefty ol’ card, and that weight really does make it feel like quality engineering at its best. And the fact it can run so comfortably at the speeds it does is admirable.

This Asus card runs at quicker, cooler and quieter than the reference card from Nvidia and in a much smaller form factor. So, in engineering terms at least, the GTX 670 Mini is an absolute winner.

Benchmarks

DirectX 11 tessellation performance
Heaven 4.0: Frames per second: Higher is better

ASUS GTX 670 DIRECTCU MINI: 21.6
GTX 670 REFERENCE: 20.6

DirectX11 gaming performance
Batman: Arkham City: Frames per second: Higher is better

ASUS GTX 670 DIRECTCU MINI: 66
GTX 670 REFERENCE: 62

GPU cooling performance
100% load: Degrees centigrade: Lower is better

ASUS GTX 670 DIRECTCU MINI: 74
GTX 670 REFERENCE: 76

Sadly, that’s not the only way you should think about this card. As much as it’s a niche product, with a niche audience – and that always incurs a price premium – at nearly £400, this is an incredibly expensive graphics card. You’ve really got to desperately want this form factor to part with this much cash for it, because the simple fact is, you don’t need to.

Because of the rise in performance from mini-ITX components, chassis manufacturers – such as Cooler Master and Bitfenix – have managed to figure out how to get full-size cards into mini-ITX boxes. And if you want to go for cases smaller than the Elite 120 or Prodigy, the length of your GPU isn’t the barrier to squeezing it in – it’s the height and the power demands.

Verdict

As much as the GTX 670 Mini is an impressive feat of engineering, that doesn’t mean it’s worth your money. You can already pick up faster, cheaper cards such as the top-end Sapphire HD 7970 GHz, and drop them straight into a funky mini-ITX form factor – just like that. It’s admirable but ultimately inessential.

TechRadar: All latest anti malware software reviews feeds

Review: Viewsonic VX2770Smh-LED

Review: Viewsonic VX2770Smh-LED

The AOC i2757Fm and this Viewsonic VX2770Smh-LED are two peas in a pod. Both are budget-oriented 27-inch models with 1,920 x 1,080 full-HD resolutions and sporting IPS panels. Indeed, they both have the same slim-going-on-non-existent bezel design.

If you were feeling particularly cynical, you might guess that they were based on some kind of shared monitor kit knocked up by some faceless mass-manufacturer, to which various monitor brands add a few distinguishing flourishes.

Non-identical

Whether or not there’s an element of truth in that, the suspicious whiff of familiarity fades as you get to know this pair of screens.

On the downside, the shiny Viewsonic looks a bit dowdy next to the spangly brushed-metal sleekness of the AOC. Somehow the pseudo-no-bezel design doesn’t work quite as well when paired with black plastic. However, the good news is that this monitor doesn’t suffer from the AOC’s craptastic default settings. Thankfully, it looks great right of the box.

As you’d expect from an IPS screen, the viewing angles are very good. OK, Samsung’s PLS panel has shown even better can be achieved regarding horizontal angles. But you’re still getting a step up from TN tech.

That quality is also evident in our test images and scales. Both white and black scales look impressive, and gradients are rendered nearly flawlessly. It’s also a little brighter and more vibrant than the supposedly similar AOC, and it quickly becomes apparent that you’re looking at a display with far fewer inherent flaws.

Is that down to panel quality or image processing? There’s a good chance they use precisely the same panel, and thus it’s odds on the latter. Whatever, if you care about image quality this Viewsonic is the obvious choice. Especially when you factor the modest cost saving. If styling and features are more of a factor, it’s a much tougher choice.

No frills

As well as being more of a looker, AOC gives you frills like MHL, a connector that allows you to pump the image of an Android smartphone onto the big screen. The Viewsonic also scores a fail with its stand and base design. For starters, the OSD controls are located on the base in a fashion apparently designed to ensure you’ve no chance of seeing them from a normal seating position. Dumb.

As for the stand, it includes a tilt hinge that is remarkably unenthusiastic when it comes to maintaining your desired position. Some re-engineering needs to be done to make the masses balance better. It’s all just a little bit off kilter in its current configuration.

Verdict

Overall, the Viewsonic VX2770Smh-LED makes for a pretty nice 1080p 27-inch panel. It’s a good choice for movie buffs and for gamers who want a big screen and either can’t stretch to one of the high-res screens or lack a graphics card capable of driving really big resolutions.

However, it’s not massively better than the best TN panels currently available, so it all comes down to whether clearly superior viewing angles and slightly better colours are worth a small price premium.

TechRadar: All latest anti malware software reviews feeds

Review: Panasonic HX-WA3

Review: Panasonic HX-WA3

Waterproof, sand-proof and with Full HD recording, the Panasonic HX-WA3 camcorder is basically made for holidays.

You don’t get a lot of these kinds of pistol-style camcorders these days, but Panasonic is persevering, having impressed us with the similar Panasonic HX-WA10 previously. Just to be confusing, the Panasonic HX-WA3 is actually an update to the WA10, despite its lower number.

There’s also a new Panasonic HX-WA30 model, which offers waterproofing to a deeper level than the WA3, and is shockproof to 1.5m/5ft. It also has a more advanced sensor that’s capable of recording at 120 frames per second, while the WA3 here tops out at 60fps.

Panasonic HX-WA3 review

But enough of the other model, what exactly do you get here in the Panasonic HX-WA3? It can record in numerous modes, including 1080p at 30 frames per second, 720p at at 60 or 30 frames per second, and at SD resolutions at 30 frames per second. It also does 1080/60i, for those into such things (or whose video editor of choice only supports such things).

The 60fps mode is particularly appealing for sports and other fast-moving subjects, partly because it means you can slow them down to half-speed when you get home without losing any smoothness or detail.

There’s a 5x optical zoom, which extends to 18x with Panasonic’s Intelligent Zoom, which is designed to use clever image processing on digital zooms to go beyond what the optical zoom can do without degrading quality badly – we were thoroughly impressed with it on the Panasonic HC-V720. There’s also Active Image Stabilisation, to make sure that you can see what’s going on when you play back handheld video footage.

Panasonic HX-WA3 review

As we mentioned, it’s waterproof, rated for up to 5m/16ft; it’s also freeze-proof down to -10C/14F, meaning that it should do well out in the snow. It also boasts a dust-proof/sand-proof design, so should survive the beach, too.

It can take still pictures at up to 16 megapixels, and offers 180-degree and 360-degree panorama modes. It offers various scene modes, but most of the time you’ll just want to use Panasonic’s Intelligent Auto system, which has proven impeccable in the past at adjusting quickly to new situations.

It boasts a bunch of effects, too, including a nice Miniature Effect mode and smart Ghost Effect mode, though we’re never keen on applying these kinds of effect in-camera – much better to record clean and add them with a good video editor later. If you don’t have one, though, or can’t be bothered to do it that way, the options will be welcome.

Performance

YouTube : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvWk4DHn4F0

The important thing is obviously video quality, and the Panasonic HX-WA3 certainly delivered some impressive moments during our time with it, but also several frustrating ones.

The best thing about this camcorder is the way it handles motion. It’s brilliant, even at the 30fps 1080p mode (the 60fps 720p mode is even better, unsurprisingly). Things can move across the screen in just a frame or two, and there’s almost no digital artefacts or degradation in the non-moving parts of the image. The things that are moving are still blurred, of course, but they don’t leave the horrible smears across the image that you get from lower bitrate recording.

Along similar lines, the Panasonic HX-WA3′s image stabilisation works really well, turning footage taken from shaky hands into fairly smooth, perfectly watchable video. It didn’t seem to be quite as capable as that on the far more expensive Panasonic HC-V720, but was easily as good as we expected.

However, the image stabilisation did seem to have the side effect of sometimes spoiling the quality of the video. We took several shots where the images would blur dramatically for a few frames, then return to normal, several times in a row. The two stills below show it happening; the second one is the very next frame after the first.

Panasonic HX-WA3 review

Panasonic HX-WA3 review

Maybe it’s the result of compensation for tiny hand movements, but it means that in an image that appears steady to the eye, everything gets randomly blurry, as if the focus has screwed up (it’s the not focus, though – the blur issues happen at various depths in the frame).

Still, the good news is that image quality from the Panasonic HX-WA3 is good enough to be ruined – if you see what we mean. Colours are mostly good, appearing realistic, if maybe just a tad washed out in cloudy weather on the iA setting. At lower zoom levels (ie, when still in the optical zoom), you can get some lovely crisp shots of fairly close subjects, with things like hair picked out strongly, and a strong amount of detail.

As things get further away, softness creeps in quickly, likely due the size of the sensor (a 1/2.33-inch CMOS – the same as most compact cameras). Edges are still picked out sharply, but you start to lose the texture of things.

Panasonic HX-WA3 review

Alas, zooming in won’t necessarily bring back the extra detail. The optical 5x zoom is great, but when going past that, the Intelligent Zoom feature comes in. It’s designed to enable you to go past the limits of the optical zoom without a large drop in image quality, and it works to a degree – but images lose a lot of the detail still.

They aren’t fuzzy, like a poor digital zoom, so the outline will be crisp, but it’s like everything’s been hastily airbrushed.

In lower light levels, the Panasonic HX-WA3 gives a pretty decent account of itself, though we noticed colour saturation dropping, and noise starting to affect the normally sharp outlines of objects.

Panasonic HX-WA3 review

However, the Intelligent Auto mode that Panasonic uses does a truly excellent job of making sure that you don’t have to think about modes or anything yourself. It handles going from light areas to dark ones well, tracks focus across objects without much faffing and always gave us results that we were confident were the best the camcorder had to offer.

Ergonomically, the Panasonic HX-WA3 is a bit of an odd one. The trigger handle shape is easy enough to grip, though we have pretty large hands, and smaller ones may struggle to grip it as steadily. It’s also easy to stick your finger in front of the lens accidentally, but practice will solve that.

The controls for zooming are quite far up, though – to the point that reaching between them causes your hand to move, which is a bit awkward if you’re recording at the time.

Panasonic HX-WA3 review

The menu is fairly easy to navigate, and there are plenty of options there, including the ability to switch to manual focus, though you can’t then adjust the focus while recording, disappointingly.

There’s also the waterproofing, of course, and this is another area where the Panasonic HX-WA3 impresses. While we couldn’t test it all the way down to 5m, it survived our trip into some shallow water just fine.

Crucially, it’s also capable of capturing great footage underwater, with almost no detrimental effect from being under. Colours are still fairly good, detail is evident, and the great motion handling means that a cloud of bubbles from something moving doesn’t cause lots of nasty artefacts.

Panasonic HX-WA3 review

And lastly, but very importantly, the battery life was excellent. During one 24-hour period where we used the camera often for a few hours, looked back over our footage later, and then occasionally grabbed it to fiddle around with, all without turning it off (we would just close the screen and leave it on standby), we only ran the battery down by around 25 per cent.

This kind of longevity is perfect for holidays. And it can be recharged through a USB cable, so a car charger or even a solar charger or USB battery pack could get it back and powered again.

Verdict

If image quality was all that mattered here, we might give the Panasonic HX-WA3 a lower score than this. But context is vital, and the Panasonic HX-WA3 as a holiday package really stands out.

It’s capable of taking some great shots, with brilliantly captured motion, even if it can have issues with image detail at other times. But the waterproofing and sand-proofing, the solid image stabilisation and the excellent battery life mean that it’s ideal for taking to the beach, up a mountain or anywhere in between.

TechRadar: All latest anti malware software reviews feeds

Review: Samsung BD-F6500

Review: Samsung BD-F6500

Video on demand is massively popular, but that’s not to say that optical disc players have had their day. Blu-ray disc sales remain strong, plus of course many of us have extensive collections of DVDs and CDs, while the future may yet yield a 4K disc format.

But what makes the Samsung BD-F6500 Blu-ray player so intriguing is that its £120/AU$ 190 (around US$ 183) price tag gives you a bountiful feature set that includes a smart TV experience that makes many TV screens look shabby.

Samsung BD-F6500 review

Further cutting-edge benefits include dual-core processing, wireless networking, multi-media file streaming, screen mirroring, Wi-Fi direct and 3D playback.

Design-wise, the Samsung BD-F6500 has plenty going for it. It’s compact – measuring just 40mm deep, 196mm high and 360mm wide (1.6 x 7.7 x 14.2 inches) – with a distinctive curved corner and touch-sensitive transport controls on the top. The fascia boasts nothing more than a camouflaged USB port, disc tray and an LED window that has a large, legible display.

Samsung BD-F6500 review

The back panel is more boring than Avengers Assemble, with just three sockets on show, all of which are digital with HDMI, Ethernet and an optical audio output. Analogue is now the exclusive preserve of high-end enthusiasts.

What the deck lacks in sockets it makes up for in terms of logos, with a trail of them festooned across the top to reassure you about its ability to output 1080p video, DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby True HD.

Samsung BD-F6500 review

There’s also an Anynet+ HDMI-CEC logo, which tells us that you can operate the Blu-ray player using a compatible TV screen’s remote control. The best interaction comes when using a Samsung screen, with for example BD Wise appearing as a new picture mode on the Samsung UE46F7000 only when it’s selected as the output on the deck. Any CEC-compatible screen will provide basic playback control, which is a handy feature.

Owners of Samsung Galaxy smartphones can throw content with the flick of a finger on to a TV via the Samsung BD-F6500, too.

Samsung BD-F6500 review

The Samsung BD-F6500 is the Korean giant’s entry-level Blu-ray deck for 2013, with just one other model, the Samsung BD-F7500, pitched at hardcore AV enthusiasts. The step-up model adds 4K upscaling, dual HDMIs, improved DVD upscaling and error correction, and multi-channel analogue audio outputs to the Blu-ray party. Hence, a much heftier price of £250/US$ 250 (around AU$ 385).

Elsewhere in the mid-range Blu-ray 2013 market, the Samsung BD-F6500 competes with 3D-capable, Wi-Fi-toting smart TV decks such as the Panasonic DMP-BDT130, Sony BDP-S5100 with Triluminos Colour, Pioneer BDP-150 and Toshiba BDX4300.

Performance

Switch on the Samsung BD-F6500 and you’re confronted with an eye-popping home screen, split into eight panes. This places the deck’s smart capabilities to the fore with movies and TV shows, apps and multimedia given prominence.

Below are icons for accessing three apps, the web browser and the settings menu. It all feels utterly modern, with multimedia files especially well presented with large, legible letters and jumbo-sized thumbnails.

Samsung BD-F6500 review

File support impressively includes FLAC, MKV with subtitles, XviD, AVCHD, DivX, M2TS, M4A, WMA, WAV and MP4, with DLNA streaming from our Netgear router limited to FLAC, MP3 and M4A.

Head to the settings menu to tinker with options for the display, audio, network, smart features and system support. Based on Samsung’s TV screen GUI, the operating system is slicker than Don Draper’s pomade collection.

Samsung BD-F6500 review

Some decks can tie you up in knots as you navigate from menu to menu inputting information, but the Samsung BD-F6500 has got it nailed. When searching online, the on-screen keypad intelligently presents the letters you’re most likely to need next in a sort of T9 way.

Picture output options include HDMI Deep Colour, the usual raft of screen resolutions (plus BD Wise), DVD 24fps conversion, aspect ratio, 3D settings and progressive mode. Audio settings include options to output as PCM, unencoded bitstream or encoded as Dolby Digital or DTS. There are plenty of controls for optimising the deck, presented in a logical and easy to use way.

Samsung BD-F6500 review

The Movies and TV Shows portal displays recommendations from video on demand services including Netflix and Acetrax. It can be frustrating not knowing the provenance of each title, nor can you do a search.

So although its recommendations are based on your viewing habits, we suspect the Apps portal will get a lot more use, where you can browse the 150-odd apps, split into six genre folders. This is an impressive number for a Blu-ray player, and includes BBC Sport, BlinkBox, iPlayer, 4OD, BFI Player, YouTube, Lovefilm and PictureBox among the Video On Demand section.

Samsung BD-F6500 review

The Samsung BD-F6500 has an inelegant but comfortable remote, featuring rugged, rubberised buttons, including glow in the gloom playback controls. A handy Tools button provides a quick way of navigating a disc, changing subtitles or audio, and so on.

The deck is quick out of the traps when it comes to disc loading, but it’s not all exemplary, since the disc tray shudders like a rattlesnake as it closes, and while spinning a platter it can sound like there’s a demented fly inside trying to escape.

Picture quality

Take any mid-range Blu-ray deck these days and you’d be hard pressed to tell the difference in terms of picture quality. The Samsung BD-F6500 fits neatly into that category.

Our Spears & Munsil HD Benchmark test disc reveals the limits of the deck’s capabilities, with the 24p wedge pattern breaking up as it swirls. Horizontal scrolling titles stutter more than vertical ones, and there are minor artefacts and smudging with edge adaptive material.

Samsung BD-F6500 review

In the real world, though, Argo on Blu-ray is grainy but strongly detailed with realistic colours and natural skin tones. Night time scenes hold up well, with reasonable clarity during a driving sequence.

Sully’s facial features are blisteringly well presented in Avatar, which looks effortlessly sparkling throughout. The 3D performance is especially good, with Monsters vs Aliens showing convincing depth to the wedding scene and a near absence of cross-talk, including the pan down of the church tower.

Samsung BD-F6500 review

DVD upscaling on the Samsung BD-F6500 is also good. BBC comedy drama Rev, for example, looks free of artefacts, with minor levels of unwanted noise and slightly soft skin.

Multimedia files all look excellent, especially JPEGs, which have levels of detail to make a Retina display-toting iPad envious. We experienced no problems with a variety of on-demand services. Masterchef in HD on BBC iPlayer and House of Cards on Netflix, for example, both scrubbed up nicely.

It’s sold as a Blu-ray deck with a built-in smart TV service, but the Samsung BD-F6500 could equally be seen as the other way round. It seems reasonably priced for a straightforward 3D Blu-ray player with Wi-Fi and multimedia streaming, but it’s the breadth and quality of its on-demand services that set it apart.

We liked

The Samsung BD-F6500 is an attractive deck with a user interface that is a total delight. Its bright, contemporary GUI is a pleasure to use and makes setting up and multimedia playback an absolute doddle. The video on-demand portal is primed with just about the best selection of apps on any Blu-ray player. Picture performance is also bang on.

We disliked

The Movies and TV Shows portal would be better if you could specify which on-demand services it featured. The deck is also noisy in operation, and the disc tray shakes like a belly dancer. The remote control could also do with a makeover.

Final verdict

We often see Blu-ray players and question why the manufacturer has included or excluded certain features, bearing in mind the price and positioning in the market. Not so, here.

Jettisoning analogue outputs seems reasonable enough on what is a straightforward all-digital deck. By favouring and refining the smart TV side of things, Samsung seems to have its finger on the pulse and has delivered an excellent all round Blu-ray deck for today’s rapidly evolving home entertainment market.

Also consider

In terms of sheer picture quality, Pioneer’s BDP-150 actually edges it over the Samsung, but has limited smart TV and requires an optional Wi-Fi dongle. Sony’s BDP-S5100 ups the social ante with a TV SideView app for interacting with iOS and Android devices, while Panasonic’s DMP-BDT130 is almost the same price as the Samsung BD-F6500 but lacks built-in Wi-Fi.

TechRadar: All latest anti malware software reviews feeds

Review: Samsung PS64F8500

Review: Samsung PS64F8500

Introduction

Samsung is not, it would seem, a brand that likes chasing anyone. It seems almost obsessed with being the pace setter, the race leader, not the valiant runner up. This obsession has seen the brand invest vast amounts of research and development time in recent years in successfully hunting down seemingly unassailable rivals in the smartphone, tablet and LCD TV sectors.

Now, if the Samsung PS64F8500 plasma TV is anything to go by, Samsung’s ruthless quest for world dominance now has a new quarry in its sights: Panasonic. Or more specifically, Panasonic’s long-revered plasma TVs.

Samsung is hardly a plasma virgin, of course. It’s served up numerous plasma television hits before. However, these previous plasma successes have mostly traded on value for money – when it comes to absolute picture quality, Panasonic has remained the king of the castle.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

With the Samsung PS64F8500, though, the brand gets so close to upsetting this established order that you can practically hear Panasonic’s teeth chattering.

As its name suggests, the Samsung PS64F8500 is a 64-inch TV – a damn fine size for movie fans, and a heck of a lot of television to be getting for a full price of £2,999.99 (around AU$ 4,620/US$ 4,575).

What’s more, despite its very respectable price the Samsung PS64F8500 is no feature lightweight. On the contrary, its highlights include active 3D playback, a comprehensive multimedia playback system, a full iteration of Samsung’s latest startlingly powerful and flexible smart TV/online platforms and a much more refined and uncompromising plasma panel design than anything the brand has unleashed before.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

You can even wave your hands at and talk to the TV if you want to – things we’ve not previously felt inclined to do, to be honest, but which suddenly, thanks to recent significant firmware updates from Samsung’s seemingly tireless engineers, have started to make sense.

Despite Samsung putting so much effort into the PS64F8500, the TV doesn’t sit at the head of a long line of cheaper plasma models, as you might expect.

There’s a 51-inch 8500 model that costs £1,899.99, but aside from that your only Samsung plasma options are the 60-inch and 51-inch F5500 models – priced at £1,299.99 and £899.99. These use less high-grade panels and video processing, don’t have built-in cameras and don’t support voice or motion control.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

If you’d rather have a Samsung LCD TV, the obvious options to consider would be the brand’s flagship F8000 LCD TVs – a range of outstanding sets that currently top out at 55 inches but will ultimately be joined by 65-inch and 75-inch models.

But you should note that the biggest two models in this series will likely be far more expensive than the Samsung PS64F8500.

So far as rival sets from other brands are concerned, the inevitable competition will be Panasonic. Where models we’ve already tested are concerned, the closest option is the Panasonic P65VT50. But we’ll also soon be looking at the brand new Panasonic P65VT65 and flagship Panasonic P60ZT65 models.

Features

Compared with the uber-svelte profiles of Samsung’s flagship LCD TVs this year, the PS64F8500 is no shrinking violet. The deep grey frame around its colossal screen is positively chunky by today’s TV standards.

And although the unusual open-framed elliptical and neckless support stand onto which the TV rests is stylish in its own way, it doesn’t really detract from the sense of the Samsung PS64F8500 being a very considerable presence indeed for your room to have to accommodate.

Tucked away on the huge expanse of the Samsung PS64F8500′s rear is a predictably strong set of connections, dominated by four HDMIs capable of receiving 3D feeds (two pairs of active shutter glasses are included free). There are also connections for Freesat HD and Freeview HD tuners, three USB ports and both LAN and built-in WLAN network support.

You can use the USBs for recording from the digital tuners to compatible USB HDDs, or for playing back a wide range of video, photo and music files from USB storage devices.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

The same sort of files can be streamed from any DLNA computers on your network, plus, of course, the network connections give you access to both the online world at large via a built-in web browser or – more usefully – Samsung’s ring-fenced but still pretty colossal smart TV service.

So far as content on its smart TV service is concerned, Samsung has now comfortably overhauled its rivals – even one-time champ Sony – with the amount of online video services it supports. Particularly noteworthy is the fact that Samsung is currently the only TV brand offering all of the UK’s main catch-up TV services – including the still rare 4OD and ITV Player.

It also supports a striking array of subscription services, including Lovefilm, Blinkbox, Netflix, Acetrax, as well as an excellent Curzon platform devoted to a strong range of art house movies and even one devoted to recordings of well-known theatrical plays.

There’s a plethora of much less significant apps too, combining information, trivia, basic games and news. There are one or two diamonds tucked away amid the rough with these, but for much of the time these second-string apps serve merely as a reminder that quality always trumps quantity.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

With this in mind, though, it’s nice to see that Samsung hasn’t automatically crammed loads of its smaller apps onto your main app menu. Instead you have to download them from a cloud-based library if you want them, so that you’re not faced daily with row after row of app clutter.

Samsung has also improved the presentation of its smart services by introducing a new multiple hub approach, where you can scroll easily between five different content-link screens: one for TV, one for on-demand film and TV, one for your own multimedia, one for social media services, and one for all Samsung’s apps.

As well as a standard Samsung remote control, you get a very handy second remote sporting a touchpad and reduced button layout, as well as a built-in mic to support the TV’s voice recognition system.

We’ve tended to be dismissive of this in the past, feeling it was rather gimmicky and too unreliable to be useful. Typically, though, Samsung appears to have merely taken such criticisms as a spur to try harder, with the result that recent firmware updates have genuinely started to make the idea of controlling your TV by talking to it worth considering.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

It’s particularly useful now as a shortcut for accessing content; for instance, you can just say ‘Show me Netflix’ at any point and the app will load without any scrolling through menus. Or you can ask the TV to ‘show films starring Tom Cruise’ and it instantly searches many of its broadcast, online and on-demand services before presenting a list of options you can select simply by speaking the number of the option you’re interested in.

There are still moments where the recognition gets things wrong of course, and there’s also an issue to do with the voice recognition’s use of a cloud-based system, whereby sometimes the TV doesn’t appear to hear you because it fails to connect to the network fast enough.

There’s also an initial period of resistance to the whole idea of talking to your TV that some people may never overcome. Though even here Samsung is working hard to reduce this particular barrier by introducing an on-TV tutorial due to go live in the next couple of months.

The Samsung PS64F8500 additionally supports gesture control, using a built-in camera you can also use for Skype calls.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

Again this was once pretty unusable, thanks to its habit of failing to recognise or track your hand properly, its fussiness when it came to trying to select on-screen options, and the sheer amount of fatigue it caused.

But again Samsung has responded to such criticisms in a positive way, having just demonstrated to us a new firmware update due to roll out soon that offers vastly improved – and faster – cursor tracking of your hand movements, a seemingly much more effective gesture recognition system that enables you to do everything with your arm resting on your chair rather than waving around fatiguingly in the air, and even a new Thumbs Up gesture recognition so you can make recommendations about things you’ve watched.

Perhaps the single most significant thing about the latest Samsung smart TV engine, though, is its ability to track the TV shows and on-demand content you watch so that it can build up a profile of what you like to watch and then make recommendations accordingly.

These recommendations appear on the home TV screen when you select it, or you can speak to the TV and ask it to recommend programmes it thinks you’ll like.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

There is an inevitable catch with this system in that it takes 2-3 months for the TV to really get a close feel for your favourite content, leaving you in the meantime sometimes feeling bewildered about some of the recommendations it makes. But we guess you just need to stick with it.

One last smart feature to mention is the way the TV enables you to control it via Samsung apps for iOS and Android devices, additionally enabling you to share multimedia between your devices and the TV, and stream video from the TV to the Android or iOS app.

The Android app also enables you to watch something from a second tuner while the rest of your family watches the main tuner on the TV.

The only problems here are that you have to use multiple apps to achieve everything that’s possible rather than having a single ‘one-stop’ app, and that you’re given no guidance anywhere over what apps you need and how to set them up. We only found out everything via regular communications with Samsung’s technical people.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

Leaving the impressive and ever-improving Smart Engine behind, the Samsung PS64F8500 sports a comprehensive range of picture adjustments and calibration tools, including all the gamma and colour management tools even the most serious of tinkerers – or a professional calibrator – could reasonably hope to find.

It’s well worth dwelling for a moment, too, on some of the major improvements Samsung has introduced to the plasma panel at the Samsung PS64F8500′s heart, because these really do have a major bearing on its performance, as we’re about to discover.

For starters, a new Real Black Pro Filter in the screen soaks up more ambient light than previous iterations, enabling black levels to look deeper on the screen and light to emerge from the screen more efficiently and potently.

Samsung has also been able to speed up its panel response time so that it can reach higher brightness peaks in real time, as well as introducing a reworked discharge waveform that gives a further boost in contrast by enabling plasma cells to go darker faster.

Brightness has been further improved, meanwhile, by increasing the panel’s active discharge space – meaning that more of the screen area can receive light from the plasma cells, by introducing Magnesium Oxide into its conduction materials to boost energy efficiency, and by deploying an improved discharge gas in the plasma chambers.

Picture quality

First impressions of the Samsung PS64F8500 in action are little short of dazzling. Literally. The huge screen defies not only every plasma TV we’ve seen before but even our expectations of what plasma is capable of by serving up extreme levels of brightness that actually manage to rival those that have proved so useful in making LCD the most popular TV option.

Even more amazingly, these unprecedented plasma brightness levels remain seemingly completely intact if you turn all the lights in your room up to max, because Samsung’s new on-screen filter design stops plasma cells being ‘infiltrated’ by ambient light.

This ability to retain all of its image punch and vibrancy even with all sorts of light in your room instantly and spectacularly – especially given the set’s prodigious screen size – makes the Samsung PS64F8500 the most genuinely living room-friendly plasma TV we’ve seen. So long as your living room is big enough to cope with a ruddy big 64-inch TV, of course.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

Those of you familiar with the way flat panel TVs usually work might be thinking at this point that such intense brightness on the Samsung PS64F8500 must come at the expense of black level response.

Not so. In fact, the Samsung PS64F8500′s black levels enjoy an improvement over previous Samsung plasmas that’s nearly as extreme as the boost in brightness, putting them up there with the most recent Panasonic plasma TVs we’ve tested.

Not surprisingly, plasma’s ability to render really deep and rich blacks in the same frame as the Samsung PS64F8500′s dazzling whites and colours ensures that pictures enjoy a degree of dynamism that’s unprecedented – especially during predominantly dark scenes – in the plasma world.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

This sense of brightness and dynamism is particularly welcome when watching 3D, because it helps Samsung’s TV combat the dimming effect of its active shutter glasses, enabling you to enjoy 3D pictures that are, for the first time with plasma, pretty much as vibrant and bright as those you might find from a high-spec LCD TV.

The Samsung PS64F8500′s 3D images are further aided by some impressively natural motion handling that suffers much less than might have been expected with plasma’s traditional issues with judder and fizzing skin tones.

Also hugely impressive while watching 3D on the Samsung PS64F8500 is just how sharp and detailed its images look – a pertinent reminder of the active 3D format’s advantages when you’re talking about a really large screen environment.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

This sense of sharpness is also evident during 2D HD viewing, of course – so much so, in fact, that we had to rein in the set’s sharpness a bit from its default settings.

Going back to 3D, the sheer scale of the Samsung PS64F8500′s screen together with the extreme but accurate sense of depth its huge contrast performance helps produce make 3D an extremely immersive experience too.

The only thing breaking this sense of immersion is the occasional appearance of a little crosstalk ghosting interference over distant objects, especially if they appear in stark contrast to the colour behind them.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

Now we’ve mentioned a negative, we might as well bring up a trio more. The potentially most troublesome issue is the appearance of green dithering noise over some shadow details during dark scenes.

Undoubtedly a product of the extreme brightness Samsung has sought to achieve from the PS64F8500, this noise is sporadic in nature and diminishes in its obviousness with every foot further back from the screen you sit. But we still became gently aware of it during our tests while using what felt like a very natural viewing distance.

A rarer and more subtle issue is some gentle fluctuations in the image’s overall brightness level while showing dark scenes – a result of the TV gently manipulating (without you being able to do anything about it) its sub-field driving system to try to get the very best contrast performance with a particular scene.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

Finally, another side effect of the aggressive way Samsung drives the PS64F8500′s panel is a degree of image retention, whereby particularly bright, static and colour-rich image elements can leave an outline of themselves behind for a few frames.

We don’t get the sense that this issue could necessarily lead to permanent retention, though, and we’d also expect its impact to diminish as the panel ages.

Despite finishing on this little run of flaws, though, don’t be put off. Overall we remain hugely impressed with the Samsung PS64F8500′s picture performance, especially when it comes to the screen’s groundbreaking brightness.

Usability, sound and value

Usability

We obliquely covered much of the usability aspect of the Samsung PS64F8500 when talking about its features. But a recap certainly can’t do any harm. So…

Samsung’s 2013 TVs go further than those of any other brand right now when it comes to trying to help people find content and interact with the features on offer.

The inclusion with the Samsung PS64F8500 of a second remote control with a touchpad and built-in mic is extremely welcome, and we’re also starting to warm after a few false dawns to Samsung’s increasingly clever (through regular firmware updates) voice recognition system. Heck, we’ve even seen demos to suggest that Samsung’s previously irritating gesture control engine is about to become usable, following yet another upcoming update.

Samsung PS64F8500 review

The move to five separate on-screen hubs works well in principle too, and the enormous sophistication of Samsung’s ‘viewing habits learning engine’ is a boon, so long as you’re patient while it builds its knowledge of your preferences.

There remain two problems with the Samsung PS64F8500′s usability, though. One is that Samsung hasn’t done enough – in the interface’s current form, at least – to help teach users about the features on offer. This means that we can readily imagine many users not even knowing that some of the features are there, or else feeling uncomfortable and uncertain about how to make the most out of them.

The other issue is that Samsung really needs to consolidate its second-device functionality so that smart device users can enjoy control of their TV, multimedia sharing and second screen viewing via one single app.

Sound

Samsung PS64F8500 review

Pictures as big and bold as those of the Samsung PS64F8500 deserve an equally big and bold audio accompaniment. And actually, that’s pretty much what they get.

The unusually powerful speaker system makes good use of the TV’s relatively large and heavy-duty chassis to produce an impressively wide soundstage that enhances the sense of immersion created by the screen.

There’s more bass in this soundstage than you’d usually hear too, courtesy of the woofer on the TV’s rear, while the main speakers are powerful and large enough to deliver both a decently scalable mid-range and some rich, harshness-free treble detailing.

Value

Samsung PS64F8500 review

Panasonic’s upcoming P65VT65 is set to cost £3,350 (around AU$ 5,172 / US$ 5,107) and Samsung’s own ‘mere’ 55-inch UE55F8000 LCD model costs £2,500 (around AU$ 3,860 / US$ 3,811).

So with that in mind, if you ask us £3,000 (around AU$ 4,620 / US$ 4,575) is by no means an outlandish amount to pay for a screen as huge, feature-rich and talented as the Samsung PS64F8500.

Verdict

The Samsung PS64F8500′s pictures are a revelation in both 2D and 3D mode, especially when it comes to their brightness and resistance to ambient light.

Samsung’s smart TV engine is miles ahead of the pack in terms of its features, content and sophistication too, plus its sound quality is a cut above the norm, and it seems very fairly priced all things considered.

However, Samsung needs to do more to help users understand all the facets of its smart TV platform. Also, the huge boost in brightness has caused some dither and slight image retention issues, and the set’s chassis is much more substantial than that of Samsung’s LCD TVs.

Final verdict

The PS64F8500 is easily Samsung’s most aggressive assault yet on Panasonic’s traditional dominance of the plasma TV market. Particularly remarkable is its brightness, which hits heights never before witnessed from plasma technology.

Couple this with the Samsung PS64F8500′s excellent black depths and sharpness levels and you’ve got a picture of stunning dynamism that makes Samsung’s behemoth as usable in a bright living room as it is in a dedicated cinema room.

The set’s smart features are unprecedentedly sophisticated too, with the only issues being a little dither noise and momentary image retention.

Also consider

We’re still waiting for many of 2013′s really large screen TVs to appear, but one alternative you could certainly consider is Samsung’s F8000 series. We’ve tested the 55-inch Samsung UE55F8000 already, but a 65-inch model is incoming with a price of around £3,500 (around AU$ 5,400 / US$ 5,334).

Another alternative would be Panasonic’s P65VT50 – one of 2012′s star TVs that can still be had for some pretty aggressive prices. But you might prefer to wait for its imminent replacement, the P65VT65, which has looked spectacular during previews.

TechRadar: All latest anti malware software reviews feeds

Hands-on review: BB Live: BlackBerry Q5

Hands-on review: BB Live: BlackBerry Q5

The BlackBerry Q5 is here, and about time too as the Canadian firm launches its first affordable BlackBerry 10 device.

Unveiled at the annual BlackBerry Live conference in Orlando the BlackBerry Q5 had been almost completely leaked under the moniker BlackBerry R10, so its design and specs come as no surprise.

There’s no firm word on which countries will be treated to the Q5, but BlackBerry is touting it as an entry-level to mid-tier device aimed at emerging markets.

BlackBerry Q5 review

What we do know is that it will be available in selected markets in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia and Latin America, with expected availability beginning in July.

It looks like the US is set to miss out on the BlackBerry Q5 and when TechRadar quizzed spokespeople on UK and Australia availability no one could provide a solid answer.

At first glance you can tell the BlackBerry Q5 will be a more keenly priced device than its high-end Q10 brother, with a swath a bezel adorning the front of the noticably plastic handset.

BlackBerry Q5 review

It lacks the premium look and finish of the Q10, but retains the classic BlackBerry QWERTY phone look, with the isolated keys a nod to past BB OS handsets such as the Curve 9320.

In terms of specs the Q5 has a lot in common with the Q10, with both devices sporting a 1.2GHz dual-core processor, 2GB of RAM and a 3.1-inch, 720×720 display – although the Q5 is furnished with a lower quality LCD offering compared to the Super AMOLED screen on the Q10.

BlackBerry Q5 review

While the bezel around the screen may be larger than on its higher-end relation it’s not necessarily a bad thing as it provides more room below the display for the upwards swipe gesture required to exit apps.

On the Q10 there isn’t any space between screen and keyboard which made the motion a little tricky at times, however on the Q5 we could easily slide our finger around without fear of pressing any keys.

BlackBerry Q5 review

Of course this does mean the Q5 is longer and the Q10, and it’s also a little chunkier as well but BlackBerry has managed to keep the weight down so it’s not overbearing in the hand.

The solid plastic rear is reminiscent of the iPhone 3GS, but there’s no metallic rim round the edge to hold things together and the glossy finish doesn’t provide a great deal of grip.

BlackBerry Q5 review

Up top there’s a headphone jack and centralised power/lock key which we found was pretty difficult to hit as it wasn’t raised above the chassis meaning you really need to push down hard for the Q5 to register your action.

Down the right side are the trio of buttons which also feature on the Z10 and Q10 with volume keys sandwiching a third switch which provides a shortcut to voice commands.

BlackBerry Q5 review

On the left there’s a microUSB port, but there’s no HDMI out option – something you do get on the other two BlackBerry 10 handsets.

Instead on the left we have a plastic flap which covers microSD and microSIM ports, allowing you to build on the 8GB of internal storage inside the BlackBerry Q5.

BlackBerry Q5 review

As you may have already guessed the presence of the slots of the left means you can’t whip the back off the BlackBerry Q5 to access the 2100mAh battery.

That shouldn’t be too much of an issue though as the battery in the Q5 should easily last you more than a day if the Q10 is anything to go by – which has the same size battery.

BlackBerry Q5 review

Thanks to the decent processor and amount of RAM BlackBerry has managed to stuff inside the Q5 the BlackBerry 10.1 operating system provides a fluid and lag-free experience.

We were easily able to glide through homescreens and apps generally opened up pretty quickly.

BlackBerry Q5 review

Because the BlackBerry Q5 is running the latest version of the BB10 OS you get features such as pin to pin messaging, but the HDR camera mode hasn’t made the cut on this cut-price handset.

The camera app itself opens in a second, but the auto-focus is quite laggy and we found the Q5 took two to three seconds to snap a picture, which is a little too long for our liking.

BlackBerry Q5 review

Round the back you get a 5MP camera and single LED flash which does produce some decent snaps, plus the front facing 2MP snapper will help with video calling and vanity checks.

BlackBerry has managed to take its lightening quick web browsing performance from the Z10 and Q10 and stick it into the Q5 and we were able to load the desktop TechRadar site in under five seconds on a strong 4G connection – that’s impressive for a handset which is aimed at the lower end of the market.

BlackBerry Q5 review

Web pages, text and images appear crisp and clear on the 3.1-inch 720 x 720 display, but it’s not quite as bright and colours don’t pop like they do on the Q10′s Super AMOLED screen.

Obviously the big attraction for anyone considering the BlackBerry Q5 is its QWERTY keyboard and once again the Canadian firm shows its prowess in this area.

BlackBerry Q5 review

The isolated keys have a decent amount of travel, but we did find it was a little trickier to type on the Q5 compared to the Q10 and the whole keypad did wobble quite a bit under our prods, which just reinforced the budget nature of this device.

For anyone who’s grown up using BlackBerry keyboards the Q5 offers more of the same, but if you’re considering switching from a fully touchscreen device you probably won’t be convinced.

BlackBerry Q5 review

Quick Verdict

The BlackBerry Q5 is one for the aficionados who can’t afford, or refuse to splash cash on the highly priced Q10, with the solid BlackBerry typing experience at the heart of everything it does.

Without knowing the price it’s difficult to say how it will stand up against other handsets, but anyone who isn’t a BlackBerry fan and is in the market for a reasonably priced smartphone probably won’t be taken with the Q5.

That said if BlackBerry manage to price the Q5 low enough it would make it a seriously attractive proposition with its decent power under the hood, HD display and rapid internet browser. We’re just going to have to wait and see.

TechRadar: All latest anti malware software reviews feeds

Review: Updated: Samsung Chromebook

Review: Updated: Samsung Chromebook

Introduction

This is technically the fifth iteration of the Google Chromebook – so long as you count Google’s own CR-48 prototype.

Despite being the fifth Chromebook, this Samsung Chromebook (formerly known as the Series 3 XE303C12) shouldn’t be confused with the Samsung Chromebook 550

If you know about Chrome OS already, you’ll know that this laptop isn’t like mainstream Windows laptops or even machines such as the Apple MacBook Air or the new 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

It doesn’t run a conventional operating system such as Windows 8, Mac OS X Mountain Lion or even a straight Linux distro such as Ubuntu.

Instead, it is essentially a computer that does one thing: run a web browser.

In this case, of course, the web browser in question is Google Chrome.

Deciding whether or not the Samsung Chromebook is right for you is actually really easy. The first thing you have to know is that it’s cheap. Really cheap.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

At a launch price of £229/USD$ 330/AU$ 319, it undercuts most conventional laptops, and is cheaper even than the new iPad mini – though it’s more expensive than the low-end Android tablets such as the Google Nexus 7 and Amazon Kindle Fire HD.

That’s only part of the decision, however.

The other – indeed, main – thing you have to consider is whether you can live with a laptop that only runs everything in a browser, and therefore, with some caveats, depends on being connected to the web at all times over Wi-Fi.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

It’s not hard to decide if this is something you can live with; take a moment, close your eyes, and think whether what you mostly do on a computer is done through a browser – or could be.

Because while you can install apps from the Chrome Web Store they’re not really applications or programs as most of us would recognise them.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

In fact, they’re little more than links that sit in your launcher and point to URLs on the web. (Actually, it’s a little more complex than that; web apps can, if their developers implement it, add extra features such as using local storage on your Chromebook, rather than solely depending on storage on the servers of the companies whose services you’re using.)

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

Regardless of the technical caveats, however, it remains true that you can’t install, say, Microsoft Office or Adobe Photoshop Elements on a Chromebook. That’s not what the Chromebook is about.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

It’s a slim, light, cheap, long-lasting little laptop that, partly because really the only thing it does is run a web browser and isn’t based on Windows, is very secure, and if you live your life in web apps such as Facebook and Google Docs (or think you could), or especially if you are already immersed in the Google ecosystem of Docs, Gmail, Calendars and more, it’s worth considering.

It comes with 100 GB of Google Drive free for 2 years.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

Specifications

While previous Chromebooks have been powered by various flavours of Intel chips (from a 1.66 GHz single-core Intel Atom N455 in the original to a 1.3GHz dual-core Intel Celeron 867 in the model this latest Chromebook supersedes), this one has an ARM processor – specifically, the 1.7GHz dual-core Samsung Exynos 5 Dual.

That it has an ARM processor at all is notable in itself, but it’s especially interesting that this is a Cortex-A15 core, 40% faster than the Cortex-A9 core (all other things being equal); the A9 is a chip that takes various forms, notably the Tegra 3 series and A5 and A5X systems-on-a-chip that power the Apple iPad 3 and Apple iPhone 4S.

What all this translates to in real life is that the new Chromebook really does feel nippy – something we’ll cover more in the next section – and is totally silent when you’re using it.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

Of course, part of the reason for the smooth performance is that the Chromebook only has SSD rather than a slower, mechanical hard disk.

But don’t get too excited; there’s only 16GB of space here, and it’s really only for cacheing stuff.

You could expand that storage by connecting a hard disk (there’s a USB 3.0 as well as the more normal USB 2.0 port on the back), but it’s worth remembering that in order to be able to open files, you need a compatible app; while the built-in player will happily display H.264 MP4s, for example, most other videos, such as .divx and .mkv files, won’t play without being uploaded to a transcoding service.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

There’s only 2GB of RAM in the new Chromebook, but in general usage, when you’re writing documents, browsing the web and so on, it never feels underpowered.

Sure, 2GB of RAM would be practically insufficient in a traditional Windows or Mac laptop, where you could be running a dozen or more apps at the same time, but here, presumably in part because it’s only running a single app, Chrome, it seems sufficient.

You get an HDMI port for connecting to an external monitor, an SD card slot, a combined headphone/mic port and a basic webcam.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

Essentially, you get pretty much all the I/O most people will need, and though you can’t install drivers in the traditional sense, lots of USB peripherals will work at a basic level just by plugging them in. (Printing is a little odd; you either have to connect over the web to a Google Cloud Print-enabled printer, or you have to go via the Cloud Print system on a middle-man computer with the Chrome browser installed which has a printer connected to it somehow.)

Unsurprisingly, there’s no optical drive.

The screen size and resolution – 11.6-inches, 1,366 x 768 pixels – are perfectly good, though the quality is distinctly lacklustre.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

The Chromebook, though, does well in portability and reasonably in longevity.

At only a little over a kilogram (1.1kg), it’s eminently toteable (and 400g lighter than its predecessor, which makes a difference), and the battery usually lasts somewhere a little over six hours – not enough to make it through most people’s working day, but certainly enough that you don’t have a constant background anxiety about being away from the mains.

One fairly major caveat, though: while there appears to be a slot for a SIM card in the back, it’s bunged with a rubber gromit, and while Google (via Amazon) offers the option to pre-order a 3G model in the States ($ 330 rather than $ 249 for the Wi-Fi-only model), it’s not currently available in the UK.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

It might seem stupid to make a computer that essentially wants to be connected to the internet at all times and that doesn’t have a SIM slot to allow mobile broadband, but, as we’ll see in the next section, it’s not quite the handicap that it might seem.

Performance

The important point here is that for most of what you’ll probably be doing on a Chromebook – browsing, emailing, writing, watching YouTube and the like – the performance is so good as to be unremarkable.

Even though we find it interesting that this model proves you don’t need the grunt of an Intel processor (albeit a low-power one), few people who buy one should know or care.

Essentially, the only times you notice delays are when it’s pulling information from the internet; on one hand, this issue is exacerbated by the fact that the Chromebook’s whole schtick is ‘pulling information from the internet’, but on the other, even the meatiest Core i7 monster would have basically the same delays if you were using a suite of online services.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

You do begin to notice delays in the auto-saving to the cloud when you’re working on big documents, but it’s not unacceptable, and it doesn’t slow you down when working.

It’s not perfect, though.

While it had no problems playing standard-definition streaming video from BBC iPlayer, say, once we tried HD streams, it struggled.

It always gave it a damn good try, and always made it through to the end, but there was sporadic flickering and slight audio glitches. It was almost there, but not enough.

At least now we do have the option of watching films and TV shows online through services such as Netflix.

Gaming, of course, is poor, even when those games are simple HTML5 ones such as Angry Birds and Bejeweled; there just isn’t the horsepower here to behave well.

Stability was curious. Most of the time, it proved to be rock solid, but occasionally – and when doing apparently innocuous things such as trying to watch a live iPlayer stream or plugging in an external monitor – it would hard reboot with no warning.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

It wasn’t disastrous, though, especially if you’re using Google’s web apps such as Docs or Gmail; changes are continuously saved to the cloud or locally if you have enabled Offline Mode, and as soon as the Chromebook has rebooted (something that only takes 10 seconds), it can restore your open tabs.

We had a few crashes but lost no work, which makes it an odd thing to judge; ultimately, of course, any crashes are bad.

That offline mode is important, especially since this is a model that only has Wi-Fi; it’s why you can keep using the Chromebook in a cafe, say, without having a connection to the internet.

Not all web apps have it, but Gmail, documents, Google Calendar and a few others do; see the list that Google maintains here.

You’d be forgiven for being suspicious of how well and reliably this offline mode works, but in truth, it has proven to be both since it was formally launched a year ago; in the process of writing this review, for example, we switched from being connected to being away from Wi-Fi frequently, and we had zero problems. To steal a phrase from Apple, it just works.

Again, though, we have to temper our enthusiasm.

There are some limitations and problems, and not just those that come from the whole idea of Chrome OS. For one thing, we tried a few different displays plugged into the HDMI port, but some weren’t recognised, and some had trouble finding a good resolution.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

And while we appreciate that this is a cheap laptop, it’s nevertheless true that you can see and feel where costs have been cut in the manufacture: that ugly hump of a screen hinge; the flex in the display; the use of silver plastic which, no matter how you squint, doesn’t quite convince you that you’re using a MacBook Air; the basic black power brick with a fiddly little connector; the screen which is terribly washed out, has poor viewing angles, and which looks like it has a layer of sugar sandwiched between the pixels and the outer surface – some will like that it’s reflection-suppressing matt, at least.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

And then there’s the fact that, on ours at least, the foot at the left of the wrist rest hovers a fraction of a millimeter above the table, producing an infinitesimally irritating little ‘clunk’ if you tap it.

The keyboard at least is good. It’s a little too flat and unresponsive to be called ‘superb’, but it’s certainly eminently usable for long periods at a stretch – and we also like that there are dedicated keys for page forward/back, refresh, window toggle and more.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

We occasionally hit the power key at the top right, but it cleverly gives you a tiny hint, by bouncing the window, that you need to hold the power button down to shut down the system.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

There’s also, controversially, no caps lock key. Instead, there’s a universal search button in its place, which pops up the list of installed ‘apps’ and lets you perform searches online without first opening a tab in Chrome.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

It took a while for us to train our muscle memory to remember to use it, but it proved a boon – and at least without caps lock, YouTube comments should be a bit more civil.

(The boring real answer is: you can reassign it as caps lock in Settings, just like you can enable/disable tap-to-click and reverse trackpad scrolling direction.)

Verdict

We’ve always liked the promise of the Chromebook idea.

Traditional computer users will sneer at it, despite its low price. They’ll use phrases like ‘full-fat operating system’, ‘no local storage’, ‘just an ARM processor’. They’ll ask what use it is when it’s not connected to the internet.

They miss the point.

Google say this is a computer ‘for everyone’ in big blue letters on the Chromebook homepage. This is hubris. It’s not the computer for everyone, not by a long shot.

However, it is a very good little machine that should appeal to a few distinct groups.

First, if you’re on a budget, here’s a brand new computer for £229.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

Second, if you already heavily use Google’s online services (including if you use Google Apps to manage your business’s domains, email and so on), signing into your Chromebook will feel like home, instantly.

Third, if most of your life is done through a web browser anyway, and there’s nothing stopping you doing the rest of it online too, then you could argue that paying even £399 for a cheap Windows laptop that has more storage, more power and can run normal apps is a waste of money.

And perhaps more importantly, if you think you could be the sort of person who could do all their computing using web apps, you could well benefit from the good battery life, silent operation, light weight and portability, simplicity and implicit security of the Chromebook, not to mention its price.

We liked

It always takes a few days for you to really ‘get’ the Chromebook – though that period is shorter if you’re a card-carrying Google aficionado who uses Gmail, Docs, Calendar and so on all the time anyway.

But once you get it, it gets under your skin. The simplicity and security of it – a nice compromise between the one-app-at-a-time mode of the iPad, say, and the potential complexity of a traditional computer – is refreshing and welcome.

It’s also cheap, light, easy to use, silent, reasonably well built, innovative and, broadly, a pleasure to use.

We disliked

Though the offline mode supported by some apps mitigates against the problem, we would nevertheless have preferred a model that had 3G as well as Wi-Fi; the Chromebook needs to access the internet in order to be able to do meaningful work, and even if you’re in range of Wi-Fi most of the time, or carry a smartphone to which you can tether, it could still prove frustrating.

The sporadic crashes irked, and the build quality issues niggled – that grainy, washed-out screen being the worst offender.

What’s more, media playback is sketchy, and while it would technically be possible to edit video using YouTube, we’d strongly counsel against it.

This is a laptop for browsing, writing, Facebooking and the like, and if you buy it without carefully thinking through what you use a computer for and deciding that one that only runs a web browser would suffice, you could be in for nasty surprises; even if there’s just one tiny app that you use on a traditional computer that can’t be comfortably replicated online, never mind if you rely on something like Adobe InDesign or want to play Medal of Honor, the Chromebook’s not for you.

There are no niceties such as a back-lit keyboard or Apple’s clever MagSafe connector.

Final verdict

Traditionally, we’d have said that a Chromebook isn’t good enough to be your primary computer, and in too crowded a market with smartphones and even tablets, to consider as a second computer.

Things change, though. It’s not the technologies that change – broadband speeds and processor power haven’t changed all that much since the Chromebook was announced late in 2010 – but what is beginning to change are our habits and priorities.

Where five years ago lots of people would have preferred desktop email clients to webmail, for example, these days millions of us access Gmail in browsers without giving it a second thought.

With that in mind, we think we might just be at a tipping point for the Chromebook concept.

This latest model is good, and for lots of people would be perfectly sufficient as a primary computer.

It’s a great cheap machine for students (so long as your campus has Wi-Fi), and not in a patronising way; younger folks are more likely to be happy using web apps rather than traditional programs anyway.

And actually, it could be a useful second machine, especially if your primary computer is a desktop tower or all-in-one, or even just a bulky, heavy laptop. It’s a good chuck-it-in-a-bag-and-head-to-Starbucks-to-get-some-work-done machine.

Samsung Chromebook XE303C12 Wi-Fi review

It is, ultimately, good at doing the thing it’s designed to do. All you have to do is decide if that thing is right for you.

TechRadar: All latest anti malware software reviews feeds